BradSpangler.com

6 Comments

• Soviet Onion says:

  January 11, 2009 at 11:22 pm

  It’s really inspiring so see such a sexy looking and professional vehicle for getting left-lib ideas out of obscurity and into peoples’ hands. I’m truly happy and impressed at this. To Chris, Brad and everyone else, goes my gratitude.
• Chris Acheson says:

  January 12, 2009 at 12:10 pm

  The “Noncommercial” part of the CC license doesn’t seem like it squares with IP abolitionism. Seems like a bad idea in practical terms, as well. Don’t we want people to reprint and sell our writings?
• Brad Spangler says:

  January 12, 2009 at 12:46 pm

  @Chris — Good point. I hadn’t paid attention to the license beyond barely noticing that it was Creative Commons. Sounds like that would be an issue to raise with the publisher.
• rev lentil says:

  January 13, 2009 at 12:22 am

  As for the license, I tried to use the least restrictive that reserved the individual rights to the authors. Perhaps I can use a different Creative Commons license. Please advice if you have any other suggestions. I can be reached at chris(at)chrislempa.info.

  FYI - I don’t care what people do with my finished product. I was trying to “protect” the individual authors.
• Chris Acheson says:

  January 13, 2009 at 10:21 am

  rev lentil-

  Attribution-ShareAlike is probably what you’d want. The ShareAlike (more commonly known as copyleft) provision is a simple negation of copyright (it prohibits prohibition of sharing), and the Attribution provision is a simple anti-fraud measure.
• rev lentil says:

  January 13, 2009 at 11:56 am

  Chris-
  Sounds like a good suggestion. FYI, here is the updated version of that license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.

  Soviet Onion -
  Please consider submitting something to the next issue.