<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War, Socialism and Precision in Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187</link>
	<description>the bottom of the rabbit hole</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rad Geek People&#8217;s Daily 2005-12-20 &#8211; Lazy linking on Leftist labor libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-27155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rad Geek People&#8217;s Daily 2005-12-20 &#8211; Lazy linking on Leftist labor libertarianism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-27155</guid>
		<description>[...] Brad Spangler (2005-12-03): War, Socialism, and Precision in Thinking writes on the need to disentangle the different meanings attached to the words capitalism and socialism (each of them has at least one traditional meaning that&#8217;s perfectly consistent with the peaceful economic cooperation, and one that&#8217;s directly antagonistic to it). Brad protests the fuzzy thinking that typically comes about from running the terms freely together, and urges libertarians to realize that If anything that is voluntary on all sides is, at the very least, acceptable to the point that it at least can not righteously be opposed by force, then one has to come to grips that a stateless society will have capitalistic and socialistic aspects in practice. Hippy communes. Farmers co-ops. Employee owned enterprises. Workers syndicates. Unions. &#8230; Ultimately, vulgar libertarians, on this point anyway, fail to distinguish libertarianism from personal preference for a particular class of business models. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brad Spangler (2005-12-03): War, Socialism, and Precision in Thinking writes on the need to disentangle the different meanings attached to the words capitalism and socialism (each of them has at least one traditional meaning that&#8217;s perfectly consistent with the peaceful economic cooperation, and one that&#8217;s directly antagonistic to it). Brad protests the fuzzy thinking that typically comes about from running the terms freely together, and urges libertarians to realize that If anything that is voluntary on all sides is, at the very least, acceptable to the point that it at least can not righteously be opposed by force, then one has to come to grips that a stateless society will have capitalistic and socialistic aspects in practice. Hippy communes. Farmers co-ops. Employee owned enterprises. Workers syndicates. Unions. &#8230; Ultimately, vulgar libertarians, on this point anyway, fail to distinguish libertarianism from personal preference for a particular class of business models. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodMennen2</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-15845</link>
		<dc:creator>GoodMennen2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-15845</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;good blog is dead blog:-) long live!...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>good blog is dead blog:-) long live!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rothbard&#8217;s Reds</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-5290</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rothbard&#8217;s Reds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-5290</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, I&#8217;ve talked about this sort of thing and its ramifications before, and I&#8217;m not the first Rothbardian to do so. As an example, note where Konkin briefly argued over two decades ago that the stateless Free Market accomplishes the libertarian communist goal of abolishing &#8220;wage slavery&#8221; (not necessarily wages per se) using the anarcho-capitalist means. &#8220;It probably should be noted explicitly that businesses could grow quite large in the counter-economy. Whether or not &#8216;wage workers&#8217; would exist instead of &#8216;independent contractors&#8217; for all steps of production is arguable, but this author feels that the whole concept of &#8216;worker-boss&#8217; is a holdover from feudalism and not, as Marx claims, fundamental to &#8216;capitalism.&#8217; Of course, capital-statism is the opposite of what the libertarian advocates.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, I&#8217;ve talked about this sort of thing and its ramifications before, and I&#8217;m not the first Rothbardian to do so. As an example, note where Konkin briefly argued over two decades ago that the stateless Free Market accomplishes the libertarian communist goal of abolishing &#8220;wage slavery&#8221; (not necessarily wages per se) using the anarcho-capitalist means. &#8220;It probably should be noted explicitly that businesses could grow quite large in the counter-economy. Whether or not &#8216;wage workers&#8217; would exist instead of &#8216;independent contractors&#8217; for all steps of production is arguable, but this author feels that the whole concept of &#8216;worker-boss&#8217; is a holdover from feudalism and not, as Marx claims, fundamental to &#8216;capitalism.&#8217; Of course, capital-statism is the opposite of what the libertarian advocates.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Klafka and left libertarian reconciliation</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-4687</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Klafka and left libertarian reconciliation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-4687</guid>
		<description>[...] Definitions are important when discussing complex concepts. I&#8217;ve mentioned before the ambiguity of terms like socialism and capitalism in that each can have both a libertarian and an authoritarian meaning. Back in 1993, in Anarchy: a Journal of Desire Armed no. 34, Lance Klafka laid blame for this state of affairs squarely at the feet of Rand in his article &#8220;Ayn Rand and the Perversion of Libertarianism&#8220;. Ayn Rand, however, attempted to offer a moral justification of capitalism by substituting the word `capitalism&#8217; for the libertarian meaning of the word &#8220;socialism.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Definitions are important when discussing complex concepts. I&#8217;ve mentioned before the ambiguity of terms like socialism and capitalism in that each can have both a libertarian and an authoritarian meaning. Back in 1993, in Anarchy: a Journal of Desire Armed no. 34, Lance Klafka laid blame for this state of affairs squarely at the feet of Rand in his article &#8220;Ayn Rand and the Perversion of Libertarianism&#8220;. Ayn Rand, however, attempted to offer a moral justification of capitalism by substituting the word `capitalism&#8217; for the libertarian meaning of the word &#8220;socialism.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Emerging Anarcho-Centrist Agenda for Socialist Revolution with Capitalist Characteristics</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Emerging Anarcho-Centrist Agenda for Socialist Revolution with Capitalist Characteristics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve approached this matter myself before and found it convenient to cite this explanation by fictional character Hagbard Celine of why Proudhon was not contradicting himself when he said both that &#8220;Property is Theft&#8221; and that &#8220;Property is Liberty&#8220;. Proudhon, by piling up his contradictions this way, was not merely being French; he was trying to indicate that the abstraction &#8220;property&#8221; covers a variety of phenomena, some pernicious and some beneficial. Let us borrow a device from the semanticists&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve approached this matter myself before and found it convenient to cite this explanation by fictional character Hagbard Celine of why Proudhon was not contradicting himself when he said both that &#8220;Property is Theft&#8221; and that &#8220;Property is Liberty&#8220;. Proudhon, by piling up his contradictions this way, was not merely being French; he was trying to indicate that the abstraction &#8220;property&#8221; covers a variety of phenomena, some pernicious and some beneficial. Let us borrow a device from the semanticists&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Spangler</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Spangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>"Excelletn as usual Brad..."

Thanks!

I might be setting myself up for an ideological smackdown, but I'm not entirely sure I want to concede the Left to you.  :)

Actually, here's one post in particular I'd like your thoughts on.

http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/221</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Excelletn as usual Brad&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>I might be setting myself up for an ideological smackdown, but I&#8217;m not entirely sure I want to concede the Left to you.  :)</p>
<p>Actually, here&#8217;s one post in particular I&#8217;d like your thoughts on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/221" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/221</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plawiuk</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>plawiuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>Excelletn as usual Brad and you have once again inspired me as I cruised through your blog to go on and on and on at my blog on libertarian labour, socialism etc. from my marxist perspective. So thanks man for the inspiration to respond to your posts from the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelletn as usual Brad and you have once again inspired me as I cruised through your blog to go on and on and on at my blog on libertarian labour, socialism etc. from my marxist perspective. So thanks man for the inspiration to respond to your posts from the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geekery Today</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>Geekery Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lazy linking on Leftist labor libertarianism&lt;/strong&gt;

Try saying that three times fast. For a while now I&#8217;ve been urging libertarians and the labor movement to take a more serious and sympathetic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lazy linking on Leftist labor libertarianism</strong></p>
<p>Try saying that three times fast. For a while now I&#8217;ve been urging libertarians and the labor movement to take a more serious and sympathetic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes on Building a Theory of Revolution, Part 2 &#187; Rational Review</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/187/comment-page-1#comment-2838</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes on Building a Theory of Revolution, Part 2 &#187; Rational Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/?p=187#comment-2838</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the themes I've pounded on is that words can have multiple definitions. Careful analysis is required in order to really use words as tools for clear thinking, instead of letting the words of others manipulate your thinking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the themes I&#8217;ve pounded on is that words can have multiple definitions. Careful analysis is required in order to really use words as tools for clear thinking, instead of letting the words of others manipulate your thinking. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
