<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Viriginia Tech and security rationing: a left market anarchist analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589</link>
	<description>the bottom of the rabbit hole</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Memory Complex &#187; Co-opting tragedy through institutional identity</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19821</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Memory Complex &#187; Co-opting tragedy through institutional identity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19821</guid>
		<description>[...] the perceived injured party? The school is, at best, incidental to the event, and may even hold some responsibility for it. But all I see are flags, bumper stickers, etc. with VT logos, colors, etc. - as if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the perceived injured party? The school is, at best, incidental to the event, and may even hold some responsibility for it. But all I see are flags, bumper stickers, etc. with VT logos, colors, etc. - as if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KC: Shooting rampage at the Ward Parkway Mall</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19803</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KC: Shooting rampage at the Ward Parkway Mall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19803</guid>
		<description>[...] in their right mind is in favor of general mayhem. In contrast with the Virginia Tech shooting, I&#8217;m not so sure more widespread civilian concealed carry could have done much to help those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in their right mind is in favor of general mayhem. In contrast with the Virginia Tech shooting, I&#8217;m not so sure more widespread civilian concealed carry could have done much to help those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevehs</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19261</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevehs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19261</guid>
		<description>Given your characterization of my response, I don't see anything approaching a constructive conversation happening here.  I'll happily admit that I don't have anything other than "vague fears, breathless predictions, and hyperbole" to match your concrete reasoning skills, and take my leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given your characterization of my response, I don&#8217;t see anything approaching a constructive conversation happening here.  I&#8217;ll happily admit that I don&#8217;t have anything other than &#8220;vague fears, breathless predictions, and hyperbole&#8221; to match your concrete reasoning skills, and take my leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19259</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19259</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There must be ways of minimizing threats posed by firearms other than strapping every kid with a gun.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm almost certain there are.  In fact, there's no need for universal firearms carrying.  But, after all, that wasn't my point.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Lets admit that sometimes horrible things happen that we canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t prevent and not rush to a cure that is destined to generate a lot more fatality over time.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm fully willing to admit that.  That's a different thing than wondering whether anything could be done differently.  But I'm certainly willing to talk about it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you think two people are less likely to shoot each other when they both have guns, try visiting the ER of any major city next weekend and tell me how the experiment is working so far.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, inner city crime is JUST LIKE campus crime!

Please, when you're ready to talk about this with me, and not some strawman NRA loon, let me know.  And when you're ready to offer concrete reasons to prohibit guns on campus - not just vague fears, breathless predictions, and hyperbole - I'll be more than happy to continue this conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There must be ways of minimizing threats posed by firearms other than strapping every kid with a gun.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m almost certain there are.  In fact, there&#8217;s no need for universal firearms carrying.  But, after all, that wasn&#8217;t my point.</p>
<blockquote><p>Lets admit that sometimes horrible things happen that we canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t prevent and not rush to a cure that is destined to generate a lot more fatality over time.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m fully willing to admit that.  That&#8217;s a different thing than wondering whether anything could be done differently.  But I&#8217;m certainly willing to talk about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>If you think two people are less likely to shoot each other when they both have guns, try visiting the ER of any major city next weekend and tell me how the experiment is working so far.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, inner city crime is JUST LIKE campus crime!</p>
<p>Please, when you&#8217;re ready to talk about this with me, and not some strawman NRA loon, let me know.  And when you&#8217;re ready to offer concrete reasons to prohibit guns on campus - not just vague fears, breathless predictions, and hyperbole - I&#8217;ll be more than happy to continue this conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Memory Complex &#187; Managed comfort trumps physical security on campus</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19258</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Memory Complex &#187; Managed comfort trumps physical security on campus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19258</guid>
		<description>[...] I simply do not see any campus firearms opponents offering concrete reasons why students shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to defend themselves with weapons. Where is the substance to their arguments? Are we now prizing our emotional innocence over our physical well-being? Or are we just so drunk with the illusion of managed security, where we pay certain people to do the dirty work of armed defense for us, that we can&#8217;t even acknowledge when the system fails? That&#8217;s the argument Brad Spangler makes: By allowing provision of security services only by establishment controlled sources, we are kept in a perpetual state of helpless infantile dependency Ã¢â‚¬â€ unaccustomed to notions of independence and personal responsibility the ruling class might find inconvenient. MaslowÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s hierarchy of needs is turned by the ruling classes toward the end of keeping the exploited classes in a constant state of anxiety. Like a monopolistic drug dealer with a safe turf protected by bribed cops, the product of security is doled out solely at the convenience of the people in charge, so as to keep the junkies enslaved. The result is a systematic inculcation of learned helplessness of the sort domestic violence opponents would surely recognize. Its impact on the oppressed is not confined to strictly the issue of arms and crime, as this security rationing induced helplessness shapes the overall attitude of the oppressed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I simply do not see any campus firearms opponents offering concrete reasons why students shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to defend themselves with weapons. Where is the substance to their arguments? Are we now prizing our emotional innocence over our physical well-being? Or are we just so drunk with the illusion of managed security, where we pay certain people to do the dirty work of armed defense for us, that we can&#8217;t even acknowledge when the system fails? That&#8217;s the argument Brad Spangler makes: By allowing provision of security services only by establishment controlled sources, we are kept in a perpetual state of helpless infantile dependency Ã¢â‚¬â€ unaccustomed to notions of independence and personal responsibility the ruling class might find inconvenient. MaslowÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s hierarchy of needs is turned by the ruling classes toward the end of keeping the exploited classes in a constant state of anxiety. Like a monopolistic drug dealer with a safe turf protected by bribed cops, the product of security is doled out solely at the convenience of the people in charge, so as to keep the junkies enslaved. The result is a systematic inculcation of learned helplessness of the sort domestic violence opponents would surely recognize. Its impact on the oppressed is not confined to strictly the issue of arms and crime, as this security rationing induced helplessness shapes the overall attitude of the oppressed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Tech, gun control and white supremacy</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19254</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSpangler.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Tech, gun control and white supremacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19254</guid>
		<description>[...] Virginia Tech, gun control and white supremacyKansas City scene: non-corporate foodUPDATED: Viriginia Tech and security rationing: a left market anarchist analysisNotes on building a case for radicalismImages of an armed AmericaKurt Vonnegut, R.I.P.To serve and protect?Proscription vs. PredictionThey&#8217;ve lost the MormonsWaPo apparently caught lying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Virginia Tech, gun control and white supremacyKansas City scene: non-corporate foodUPDATED: Viriginia Tech and security rationing: a left market anarchist analysisNotes on building a case for radicalismImages of an armed AmericaKurt Vonnegut, R.I.P.To serve and protect?Proscription vs. PredictionThey&#8217;ve lost the MormonsWaPo apparently caught lying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevehs</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19251</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevehs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19251</guid>
		<description>"And I think a high school student who can be trusted with a car can certainly be trusted with a gun, let alone a college student."

You spend much time with high school students lately?  There must be ways of minimizing threats posed by firearms other than strapping every kid with a gun.  

What kind of social network is being built when the individuals of a society walk around armed on a regular basis, always wary of threats around the corner?  You wanna generate more paranoid nuts who eventually crack and go on school shooting sprees?  Start by encouraging their sense of alienation and environmental hostility when you throw a holster on everyone they see around them.  For every individual you protect this way you will be killing a dozen more.

Lets take a step back from the knee-jerk ideological response and try to think what would actually happen in the circumstances we propose.  Lets admit that sometimes horrible things happen that we can't prevent and not rush to a cure that is destined to generate a lot more fatality over time.  

Sure, we feel a bit helpless when we imagine that some wacko has a gun and we don't.  That is a natural concern, but lets temper our concern with reason.  In the context of a society consisting of millions of individuals you are statistically FAR safer when you encourage people to refrain from carrying weapons routinely.  School shootings are horrible, but statistically they are an anomaly.  

If you think two people are less likely to shoot each other when they both have guns, try visiting the ER of any major city next weekend and tell me how the experiment is working so far.  People who carry guns use them, even the most level headed ones are more likely to make fatal mistakes than heroically save the day.

Making gun possession illegal isn't going to stop people from shooting each other.  Neither is encouraging everyone to run straight to the source of the problem for a convenient solution.  If you want to encourage people to do something to avoid school shootings, how about encouraging people to participate in more community activities and seek therapy when they feel full of angst?  Lets tone down the testosterone and turn on our social awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And I think a high school student who can be trusted with a car can certainly be trusted with a gun, let alone a college student.&#8221;</p>
<p>You spend much time with high school students lately?  There must be ways of minimizing threats posed by firearms other than strapping every kid with a gun.  </p>
<p>What kind of social network is being built when the individuals of a society walk around armed on a regular basis, always wary of threats around the corner?  You wanna generate more paranoid nuts who eventually crack and go on school shooting sprees?  Start by encouraging their sense of alienation and environmental hostility when you throw a holster on everyone they see around them.  For every individual you protect this way you will be killing a dozen more.</p>
<p>Lets take a step back from the knee-jerk ideological response and try to think what would actually happen in the circumstances we propose.  Lets admit that sometimes horrible things happen that we can&#8217;t prevent and not rush to a cure that is destined to generate a lot more fatality over time.  </p>
<p>Sure, we feel a bit helpless when we imagine that some wacko has a gun and we don&#8217;t.  That is a natural concern, but lets temper our concern with reason.  In the context of a society consisting of millions of individuals you are statistically FAR safer when you encourage people to refrain from carrying weapons routinely.  School shootings are horrible, but statistically they are an anomaly.  </p>
<p>If you think two people are less likely to shoot each other when they both have guns, try visiting the ER of any major city next weekend and tell me how the experiment is working so far.  People who carry guns use them, even the most level headed ones are more likely to make fatal mistakes than heroically save the day.</p>
<p>Making gun possession illegal isn&#8217;t going to stop people from shooting each other.  Neither is encouraging everyone to run straight to the source of the problem for a convenient solution.  If you want to encourage people to do something to avoid school shootings, how about encouraging people to participate in more community activities and seek therapy when they feel full of angst?  Lets tone down the testosterone and turn on our social awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19250</guid>
		<description>"Besides, the question isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t whether people should be allowed to carry guns - itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s whether there is an authority that can legitimately prohibit it."

Yeah I agree. And that's not really the point was trying to make either.

What I'm getting at I guess is that merely allowing guns to be carried is not some panacea that would have prevented this tragedy. I think that a gun in an untrained and irresponsible hand could easily have made this worse, not better. I think its allowing those who wish to act responsibly to do so, to allow students and staff to rely on themselves, not just the official sanctioned security forces.

But it could have easily made things worse not better. That's not to say people shouldn't be allowed to carry, so long as they aren't harming others. Of course they should. But I don't know if that would have made any real difference in VA..it may have made things worse.

I would hope that only those well trained in the use of guns would want to carry them, making the kind of distributed protection work well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Besides, the question isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t whether people should be allowed to carry guns - itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s whether there is an authority that can legitimately prohibit it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah I agree. And that&#8217;s not really the point was trying to make either.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m getting at I guess is that merely allowing guns to be carried is not some panacea that would have prevented this tragedy. I think that a gun in an untrained and irresponsible hand could easily have made this worse, not better. I think its allowing those who wish to act responsibly to do so, to allow students and staff to rely on themselves, not just the official sanctioned security forces.</p>
<p>But it could have easily made things worse not better. That&#8217;s not to say people shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to carry, so long as they aren&#8217;t harming others. Of course they should. But I don&#8217;t know if that would have made any real difference in VA..it may have made things worse.</p>
<p>I would hope that only those well trained in the use of guns would want to carry them, making the kind of distributed protection work well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19248</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19248</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t know how to approach my concern about untrained, immature and stressed out students carrying guns.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gun safety training is not a terribly difficult thing to acquire, and it is basically a lot of common sense.  Now, I used to feel the same way you do, but having shot guns more often lately I really feel like they're not hard to control. And I think a high school student who can be trusted with a car can certainly be trusted with a gun, let alone a college student.

Besides, the question isn't whether people should be allowed to carry guns - it's whether there is an authority that can legitimately prohibit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t know how to approach my concern about untrained, immature and stressed out students carrying guns.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gun safety training is not a terribly difficult thing to acquire, and it is basically a lot of common sense.  Now, I used to feel the same way you do, but having shot guns more often lately I really feel like they&#8217;re not hard to control. And I think a high school student who can be trusted with a car can certainly be trusted with a gun, let alone a college student.</p>
<p>Besides, the question isn&#8217;t whether people should be allowed to carry guns - it&#8217;s whether there is an authority that can legitimately prohibit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberator Reloaded</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589/comment-page-1#comment-19247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberator Reloaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/589#comment-19247</guid>
		<description>[...] Besides that whole VPI thingy with the nutcase with the guns and the disarmed victims without the guns and such, but all the smart people have commented on that already (Brad Spangler&#8217;s post once again stands out). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Besides that whole VPI thingy with the nutcase with the guns and the disarmed victims without the guns and such, but all the smart people have commented on that already (Brad Spangler&#8217;s post once again stands out). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
