<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source pistol design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663</link>
	<description>the bottom of the rabbit hole</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Milan</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663/comment-page-1#comment-19949</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663#comment-19949</guid>
		<description>Hi, Brad.

What sort of parameters are you looking at?

If you want simple &#38; cheap - &#38; especially disposable - then it seems to me you're talking about a one-shot weapon that would be built around the cartridge.  Point, shoot, throw away.  I don't see how anything could be cheaper &#38; easier than that.

If you're talking about reloading at all, that complicates the mechanism.  If you're talking about making it any kind of repeater, even a revolver, that complicates the mechanism &lt;em&gt;enormously.&lt;/em&gt;  

Any kind of multi-shot capability also makes it harder to make the weapon safe to fire.  Whereas if your cartridge is simply sealed permanently inside the weapon, it becomes a lot simpler to contain those nasty, hot, high-pressure gases, and make sure they only come out the one hole in the front they're supposed to.

There's also a question of how you envision these things being fabricated.  What advantage do you see in using polymers?  Metal, metal-working tools, and metal-working skills are widely available.  You can right now name a metal - steel - which is safe for making firearms and also readily available, even abundant.  It even comes conveniently made in a wide variety of shapes which might be used or readily adapted for use in your design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Brad.</p>
<p>What sort of parameters are you looking at?</p>
<p>If you want simple &amp; cheap - &amp; especially disposable - then it seems to me you&#8217;re talking about a one-shot weapon that would be built around the cartridge.  Point, shoot, throw away.  I don&#8217;t see how anything could be cheaper &amp; easier than that.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re talking about reloading at all, that complicates the mechanism.  If you&#8217;re talking about making it any kind of repeater, even a revolver, that complicates the mechanism <em>enormously.</em>  </p>
<p>Any kind of multi-shot capability also makes it harder to make the weapon safe to fire.  Whereas if your cartridge is simply sealed permanently inside the weapon, it becomes a lot simpler to contain those nasty, hot, high-pressure gases, and make sure they only come out the one hole in the front they&#8217;re supposed to.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a question of how you envision these things being fabricated.  What advantage do you see in using polymers?  Metal, metal-working tools, and metal-working skills are widely available.  You can right now name a metal - steel - which is safe for making firearms and also readily available, even abundant.  It even comes conveniently made in a wide variety of shapes which might be used or readily adapted for use in your design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663/comment-page-1#comment-19945</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663#comment-19945</guid>
		<description>Wow, I'd never heard of this.  What a great idea!

BTW, I got the first issue of American Gun Culture Report, and it's awesome.  I highly recommend it - hell, consider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;d never heard of this.  What a great idea!</p>
<p>BTW, I got the first issue of American Gun Culture Report, and it&#8217;s awesome.  I highly recommend it - hell, consider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Spangler</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663/comment-page-1#comment-19942</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Spangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663#comment-19942</guid>
		<description>Another option might be a four shot &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolver" rel="nofollow"&gt;revolver&lt;/a&gt; with each firing chamber having its own barrel. The barrel assembly could potentially be manufactured from a single square block of whatever polymer is used for the construction, with four barrel tubes drilled through and pre-loaded. The barrel assembly could be disposable but removable from a re-usable grip and trigger assembly -- like a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedloader" rel="nofollow"&gt;speedloader&lt;/a&gt; without the actual loading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option might be a four shot <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolver" rel="nofollow">revolver</a> with each firing chamber having its own barrel. The barrel assembly could potentially be manufactured from a single square block of whatever polymer is used for the construction, with four barrel tubes drilled through and pre-loaded. The barrel assembly could be disposable but removable from a re-usable grip and trigger assembly &#8212; like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedloader" rel="nofollow">speedloader</a> without the actual loading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_acheson</title>
		<link>http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663/comment-page-1#comment-19941</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_acheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradspangler.com/blog/archives/663#comment-19941</guid>
		<description>It sounds like what you want is a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_gun" rel="nofollow"&gt;zip gun&lt;/a&gt; that won't blow off your fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like what you want is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_gun" rel="nofollow">zip gun</a> that won&#8217;t blow off your fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
